Steve - picture archive
Steve - picture
about this site
blog
resume
resume
interesting clips
archive
archive
the china chronicles
nlgja
childrens story
gallery
guestbook
contact me
 
     

January 24, 2008

What's Gay Got To Do With It?

By STEVE FRIESS

One of the funnest parts of taking on bigots is that their small-mindedness does not simply extend to whatever bias they present to the world. Almost without fail, they tend to also posit feeble and illogical arguments to support their views.

And so it was last week when a local writer named Don Jones wrote to Lyle Brennan, editor of the monthly Nevada Business Journal, to take issue with part of Brennan’s recent screed against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. In and among Brennan’s scathing assessment of the most powerful political figure in state history was humming along pretty comfortably analyzing the fiscal impact of a variety of Reid’s positions when Jones was socked in the gut by this line:

"I believe that Harry Reid is basically a decent guy, but in his position as Majority Leader, he now appears to support some pretty awful proposals. The entire ‘progressive’ agenda is based on the premise that there are no moral absolutes. In fact, let's hand out condoms to middle-schoolers and show them how to use them. Gay marriage is great, and the worst kind of smut should be allowed into our homes over the public airwaves."

Jones is gay, as am I. He was offended – and so am I -- by the snark in this passage and copied me on the note he sent to call Brennan on his homophobia. “Your January 2008 Commentary made it clear that I, as a gay business owner, am neither welcome in your pages nor supported by your agenda,” Jones explained.

Brennan, to his credit, responded. What he said, however, was silly. He claimed that since the matter was on his opinion page, nobody ought to be upset by it. He also noted that his support of marriage inequality came from his personal religious beliefs and then insisted he’s not a bigot because – wait for it – he’s got gay staffers.

But the best part was Brennan’s answer: “It has been a goal of this publication to be a conservative business voice to our state. It is not our goal to offend anyone group or individual, but we believe it to be our responsibility to voice the concern of the conservative business collective of Nevada.”

In two sentences, he destroyed his own position. His religious opposition to gay marriage is one thing, but there is nobody in Las Vegas who, with a straight (sorry!) face, would seriously say same-sex marriage is an economic threat.

In fact, the precise opposite is true. Can’t you imagine the rainbow-colored tsunami of gay couples that would flood the Strip to get hitched? A few years ago when gay marriage was being legalized all over the nation – only to see it halted everywhere except in Massachusetts by those pesky activist judges that the right always rails against – couples were flocking to such uninteresting places as New Paltz, N.Y., and Bernalillo, N.M. to tie the knots. It is clearly within the business interests of Nevada companies to legalize same-sex marriage and reap the bounty that would follow of Mike and Dan or Cissy and Bianca. Las Vegas is already the second most popular travel destination for gays and lesbians, according to a California market research firm, ahead of such Meccas as – believe it! – San Francisco and Miami.

There is a reason why the major resorts have almost all thrown open their wedding chapels to legally insignificant but personally meaningful gay union ceremonies. MGM Mirage and Harrahs now spar for bragging rights as the most gay-friendly company, openly gay performers are commonplace on the Strip and even a man as notoriously Republican as Sheldon Adelson recently told me he considers himself to be a “social liberal.” Heck, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority now provides showboys for floats in the Gay Pride Parade in New York to promote the destination to this segment and eagerly courted the upcoming convention of the International Gay and Lesbian Travel Association.

Brennan ought to know by now that this is a state where even the most conservative businessmen enjoy the profits from a list of activities that wouldn’t pass the muster in church.

What’s even more interesting is that Brennan’s cheap shot at Reid on gay marriage was also inaccurate. The senator has long opposed same-sex marriage and, anyhow, Congress hasn’t had any legislation to consider on the matter in the year that Brennan was critiquing. Perhaps he’s referring to Reid’s 2006 efforts to stall the radical Federal Marriage Amendment; the senator said he prefers to let the states decide these things. On almost any other issue, that’s the “conservative” view.

Brennan insisted he meant no offense, but which is a lie and his Bible says that’s a sin. Regardless of how many gay men and lesbians are unfortunate or unwise enough to work for him, the sentence Jones spotted was simply mean-spirited and offensive. An honorable person would at least acknowledge as much.

My favorite part of all of this was that, in rooting around the Nevada Business Journal website for information on what is billed as “Nevada’s only statewide business journal,” I came across the editorial calendar for the year as posted for potential advertisers.

Next month’s cover story? “Minority-Owned Businesses: An overview of Nevada businesses owned by minorities and their contributions to the economy.”

I don’t know about you, but I just can’t wait!

###

Go to list of Las Vegas Weekly stories

Go to list of Publications


about this site | blog | resume | in the news | important clips | archive | podcast
the china chronicles | nlgja | children's story | gallery | guestbook | contact me